T. W. Baldwin
Volume 2
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
FORMATION OF THE AUTHORIZED GRAMMAR Tai This grammar had an English part and a Latin part, as in the authorized grammar, and the objection was to the omission of matter which had customarily been appended to the Latin part. It would have been printed by Wolfe, who had a monopoly on grammars, and dwelt in Paul's Churchyard. But wherever Hayne got his information, he says that the revision of the grammar occurred in 154S, and quotes an edition of 1546 which was of the final revised form. We have seen that this revision was after r544. The correct date is thus between 1S44 and 1546, and may well be 1545 as Hayne says. It will be remembered that in this year King Henry reformed the Primer with A.B.C.22Quite likely, the next textbook above, the authorized grammar, also received its final touches at the same time. Here we are to remember that Prince Edward had a volume containing an A.B.C. of 1543, a first part of the grammar of 1542, and a second part of 154o. The three are closely connected, and are likely all to have been given a final polishing together in 1545. 22 Baldwin, Petty Schaal; Wood, N., The Reformation and English Education, pp. 237 ff