T. W. Baldwin
Volume 2
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;564 SMALL LATINE AND LESSE GREEKE history ought to be directed to this moral end-not that this attitude was original with him! One would need then to begin history along with the poets in order to get subject matter for themes both in verse and in prose, beginning with epistles. Accordingly, at Eton in 1530, the boys of the, fifth form were reading Ovid's Epistalae Heraidum and Sallust, as well as Cicero's Epistles, while they learned prosody and wrote epistles. They studied epistles, both in prose and in verse, and used history for further subject matter all as Erasmus directs. Throughout the century, this remains the approximate position of history in the grammar school scheme. The historians prescribed are in order of frequency Sallust, Caesar, Livy, Justin, Valerius Maximus (so classed), and Florus. We may regard Sallust and Caesar as universal. One or the other is mentioned in twenty-six out of the twenty-nine curricula I have tabulated. They appear together in fourteen of the twenty-six. Sallust is mentioned in nine others without Caesar, making a total of twenty-three mentions out of the twenty-six. Caesar is mentioned in three without Sallust, making a total of seventeen mentions out of the twenty-six. But this comparison is not fair to Caesar. For Sallust pre-cedes and Caesar comes only in the last form or forms. Since the statements for these last forms are regularly indefinite, Caesar has probably failed of several mentions on this account. Thus Sallust is nearly always required, and Caesar was no doubt as nearly universal. We may regard these two as furnishing the backbone of history for the curricula. That we may better understand the situation, Ascham will be delighted to present to us the great grammar school triumvirate in prose. Foure men only whan the Latin tong was full ripe, be left vnto vs, who in that tyme did florish, and did leaue to posteritie, the fruite of their witte and learning: Yarro, Salust, Caesar, and Cicero a The poets of the age, Lucretius, Catullus, Virgil, and Horace, Ascham tosses aside-even Virgil. But since of the four prose writers Varro's works were mostly lost, Ascham and his age turned to the prose triumvirate, Sallust, Caesar, and Cicero. Ascham gives Sir John Ascham, Scholemaster (1370), p. 63r. Compare Bacon's statement, "there lived the best poet, Virgilius Mato; the best historiographer, Titus Livius; the best antiquary, Marcus Varro; and the best, or second orator, Marcus Cicero, that to the memory of man are known" (Sped-ding, /Forks of Francis Bacon (taco), Vol. VI, p. tos). The man who wrote Shakspere's plays did not believe that Virgil was the best poet.