T. W. Baldwin
Volume 2
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
LUCAN, SILIUS ITALICUS, MARTIAL, CATULLUS 551 The figure of joy hiding in tears is the same. The coincidence here is hard to explain as mere chance. The general idea of weeping for joy is, of course, a commonplace used elsewhere by Shakspere and many another. But the figure of joy hiding in tears is not, so far as I know, a commonplace. Shakspere did not likely think of that independently-not that he could not, but that he did not need to. It may have been suggested by Lucan, but I see no way to be certain, unless we knew first that Shakspere read Lucan. William Theobald has pointed out still another parallel to this ninth book. Thou wast a soldier Even to Cato's wish.' This refers to that splendid eulogy pronounced by Cato over the murdered Pompeius Magnus, beginning "Civis obit" IX. 13o.16 But as Lewis Theobald had shown long before, Shakspere had this i tern from the source of his play, Plutarch 17 Shakspere certainly knew something of Lucan, and Lucan was regularly required in grammar schools on the Eton system in Shakspere's day; but is seldom, if ever, specified elsewhere. I do not consider evidence so far produced strong enough to show that Shakspere had any direct and detailed knowledge of Lucan's tumid embroidery, whether in the original or through other sources. But he very well may have had some knowledge of the original from grammar school. In the Westminster curriculum sometime after 1574, Silius Italicus is mentioned along with Lucan as a possibility for the sixth and seventh forms. Both Lucan and Silicas Italicus are mentioned else-where, but I know of but one very feeble parallel to Silius Italicusla in Shakspere, and that in a play of doubtful authorship. I take this to mean that the critics have not read much of Silius Italicus either-and I, at least, shall not blame them; I have-now. Of Martial, specified for Eton, Westminster, and Ruthin, all on the Eton system, I find no certain trace in Shakspere, though several parallels have been suggested. Catullus was also specified at Eton and Westminister, and along with him were frequently printed Tibullus, Propertius, and sometimes Gallus, though I find no specification of these in grammar school. I know of but one really close parallel to Catullus in Shakspere. In 2 Henry IV,,Travers describes the speed of a horse 16 Coriolanus, I, 4, 56-57. ' Theobald, W., Classical Element, p. 237. 17 Theobald, L., Shakespeare (1733), Vol. VI, pp. 20-21. " Malone, Variorum (1821), Vol. XVIII, p. 26. See also Theobald, W., Classical Element PP. 328-329.