T. W. Baldwin
Volume 2
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;OVID 455 Ovid was surrounded by a huge critical apparatus. Until we know him in that setting, we do not know the Ovid whom Shakspere and the sixteenth century knew. Such a study cannot be under-taken here. But perhaps we now have some glimpse of the position Ovid occupied, and some consequent idea of what contemporaries meant by their comparison of Shakspere with Ovid. Shakspere him-self has shown that he was proud to be Ovid's successful ape. Poor Shakspere! He did so many of the things Ascham thought one ought not to do, and he ended up exactly as Ascham predicted such a man would end. Ascham rather proudly confesses that he "had neuer Poeticall head, to make any verse, in any tong," and then proves the statement beyond possibility of doubt by quoting an English poem of his own making," which is nearly as bad as the elegant concoctions of Holofernes himself. Aschatn was interested in training up a Tullian orator, not an Ovidian poet. And therfore the quickest wittes commonlie may proue the best Poetes, but not the wisest Orators: readie of tonge to speake boldlie, not deepe of judgement, either for good counsel! or wise writing.B7 Therefore, Ascham will have none of these quick wits so apt to be-come merely poets. Similarly, he distrusts music and mathematics. So Ascham mentions an epitome of Ovid, and commends Golding's translation as translation (it could not have done much harm as poetry, though Brinsley thought it to be in excellent metre); but he does not waste his time upon Ovid and poetry; he is for Tully and oratory. So, "Grammer scholes haue fewe Epitomes to hurt them, except Epitheta Textoris."98 Unwarned by Ascham's still recent fulmination, a musical-headed London-Oxford Welshman (perhaps!), Thomas Jenkins, no doubt ruined William Shakspere as a staidly useful oratorical member of society by teaching him Ovid, and forcing him to write verses with the aid of the contaminative Textor. And see what came of it! BĪ Ascham, Scholetnaster (1570), p. 31v. Cf. above, p. 3$r. f7 Ascham, Scholernaster (1570), p. 4v. Ascham, Schslemaster (1570), p. 42V.