T. W. Baldwin
Volume 1
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
CHAPTER XXV LOWER GRAMMAR SCHOOL: SHAKSPERE'S GRAMMAR As WE HAVE NOW SEEN, the statement of ronson would imply a practically complete grammar school training for Shakspere, and Bees-ton's would imply the same. Further, the King's Free Grammar School at Stratford was a competent one, competently taught, with competent results. There is thus both presumption and credible contemporary witness to imply that Shakspere had received at Ieast a competent grammar school education. There is not a shred of evidence nor any just ground for suspicion that Shakspere received that grammar school training elsewhere than at Stratford. Yet because of the general uniformity of curricula and methods at the time, the particular school in which Shakspere received his training is not for our present purpose of great importance. It was the conscious purpose of the authorities so to regiment schools and texts that transfers in teachers and schools would not retard the progress of the pupils. Because of this regimentation, the curricula had a certain common denominator of uniformity. In this way it becomes possible to infer with some accuracy how far Shakspere had gone in this curriculum by observing the knowledge of it which he displays, Stratford was not on the Eton system, since the boys were not required to have any grammar before entrance. Neither was Stratford on the cathedral system, which had been modified from the Eton. Since it had both a master and an usher, it probably had six forms, though it may have had five or seven, or even eight. But the organization of its curriculum into forms is relatively unimportant. As a standard grammar school, it would have presented the conventional subjects and processes in conventional sequences; and those subjects, processes, and sequences are now known. Our problem is thus to see to what extent Shakspere had been subjected to the processes of this known curriculum. Shakspere should have learned in some form of petty school the elements of reading, writing, and perhaps casting accounts.' Then when he was about seven in X571, he should have entered the gram-mar school under the usher, and should have completed the lower ' See Baldwin, Prlty School, 1943.