T. W. Baldwin
Volume 1
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;438 SMALL LATINE AND LESSE GREEKE Ramus adapts Sturm more closely than seems to be generarally recognized. Ascham is influenced by Sturm. Manutius contributes such ideas as how Virgil has imitated Homer. Someone should edit Kempe, locating specifically the sources of each of his ideas; but that is not necessary for our present purpose. Kempe precedes his detailed discussion and explanation of the curriculum with a clear-cut statement of principles. Now followeth the duetie of the Schoolemaister, which is to vse the best way and order both in teaching and also in gouerning. Touching the former, all knowledge is taught generally both by precepts of arts, and also by practise of the same precepts. They are practised partly by obseruing examples of them in other mens workes, and partly by making somewhat of our owne, and that first by imitation, and at length without imitation. So that the perfection of the arte is not gotten at the first, but Per numeros aeniunl ista gradusque suos. Wherefore first the scholler shall learne the precepts: secondly, he shall learne to note the examples of the precepts in vnfoulding other mens workes: thirdly, to imitate the examples in some worke of his owne: fourthly and lastly, to make somewhat alone without an example. Now, all these kindes of teaching are seene in euery speciall sort of the things taught, be it Grammar, Logike, Rhetorike, Arithmetike, Geometric, or any other Arte (Fiv--Far)- to which, we would add the construction of plays. Kempe thus takes as a basis the fundamental pedagogical doctrine of Ramus,' which is also accepted by Brinsley, who claimed that by his methods schollers may haue daily much sure practice both of Analysis and Genesis; that is, resoluing and making Latine: which as was noted, all the learned doe acknowledge to be almost all in all, in getting all learning, for all this practice by them is nothing else but Analysis and Genesis, as we shewed before.' Kempe's first two stages are analysis, his latter two genesis. All these principles Ramus had emphasized as fundamental, and by schematizing them Freigius had given them further emphasis. Eventually, these are only a slight adaptation of the fundamental doctrine of !'d Herennium. Haec omnia tribus rebus assequi poterimus, arte, imitations, exercitatione. Ara, est praeceptio, quae dat certam viam, rationemque dicendi. Imitatio, Graves, F. P., Peter Ramus and the Educational Reformation, p. 117. 6 Brinsley, Ludus Literarius (1627), p. lo8. Rayne also founds his system upon analysis and genesis, giving a full scheme (Certain Epistles of roily (16i1), Introduction).